P
rince William’s relocation to Forest Lodge in Windsor Great Park has sparked a wave of neighbor discontent, with residents accusing the future king of misusing his influence. The Prince of Wales and Kate Middleton, along with their three children—George (12), Charlotte (10), and Louis (7)—have reportedly erected a “no‑go” zone around the estate, threatening arrests for trespassers and blocking access to a nearby Christmas tree shop.

    Republic chief executive Graham Smith slammed William for exploiting his “power and privilege” to disrupt local life. “The Christmas trees issue may seem trivial, but the land is public. William should not have closed roads or restricted access,” Smith told Newsweek. He added that the move forced two families to relocate within the park, describing it as another example of the prince asserting dominance over land that isn’t his.

    Earlier reports from The Sun detailed the installation of CCTV, extensive fencing, and landscaping designed to deter trespassers around the eight‑bedroom mansion, which spans roughly 370 acres with a 3.7‑km perimeter. Signage warns the public not to enter. While some residents expressed frustration—one lamented losing a familiar walking route for his dog—others accepted the security measures as necessary for the royal family’s safety. “We understand the importance of William and Kate’s security,” said a resident, adding that the family’s move to Forest Lodge was exciting.

    The Wales family had previously lived at Adelaide Cottage near Windsor Castle. Insiders say the move was motivated by a desire for a “fresh start” after the death of Queen Elizabeth and the cancer diagnoses of Kate and King Charles. Renovations at Forest Lodge began in September, with interior and exterior updates underway and the family aiming to settle in by Christmas. Kate was seen selecting new furnishings, including a 24‑seat table.

    Forest Lodge, owned by the Crown Estate, was last renovated in 2001 for £1.5 million and had previously been listed for £15,000 a month. The eight‑bedroom property was valued at £5.5 million in 2001, but current price indices suggest a market value of around £16 million.

    The controversy highlights tensions between royal security protocols and community access, with critics labeling the prince’s actions as an abuse of power and privilege.