realestate

VNQ vs. RWR: Wide Real Estate Coverage or Targeted REIT Allocation

Both ETFs track U.S. real estate, yet their index design causes distinct portfolio behavior as markets and rates change.

B
oth ETFs give investors exposure to U.S. real‑estate, yet the way each index is constructed causes distinct portfolio dynamics when market conditions and rates change.

    **Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VN Q)**

    * Lower expense ratio (0.13 %) than RWR (0.25 %)

    * Much larger AUM – $65.4 bn versus $1.71 bn for RWR

    * Tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, which includes a wider universe of real‑estate companies, some non‑REITs, and a few non‑property sectors.

    * Holds 158 securities, 98 % real‑estate, 1 % communication services, 1 % cash. Top holdings: Welltower, Prologis, American Tower.

    * 1‑yr total return: –1.15 % (as of 2025‑12‑18)

    * Dividend yield: 3.86 %

    * Beta: 1.2 (vs. 1.18 for RWR)

    **State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR)**

    * Focuses strictly on the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Capped Index, containing only REITs.

    * 102 holdings, all classified as real‑estate.

    * 1‑yr total return: –0.63 %

    * Dividend yield: 3.87 %

    * Beta: 1.18

    * Max drawdown over 5 years: 32.58 % (vs. 34.48 % for VN Q)

    * Growth of $1,000 over 5 years: $1,151 (VN Q) vs. $1,047 (RWR)

    Neither ETF uses leverage, currency hedges, or ESG screens, making them straightforward real‑estate plays.

    **Investor implications**

    * **VN Q** is a large, liquid core holding with a low fee, suitable for a long‑term, stable allocation that can ride through rate cycles with minimal oversight.

    * **RWR** offers a tighter REIT focus, appealing to those who want a concentrated REIT exposure even if it means a smaller, more narrowly defined portfolio.

    **Key differences**

    * VN Q’s broader index spreads risk across more business models and revenue streams, potentially smoothing volatility.

    * RWR’s narrower mandate keeps returns more tightly linked to a smaller set of property owners and operators, which can amplify sensitivity to REIT‑specific factors.

    **Glossary (short)**

    * **ETF** – a fund that trades on an exchange and holds a basket of assets.

    * **Expense ratio** – annual fee as a % of assets.

    * **AUM** – total market value of assets managed.

    * **Dividend yield** – annual dividends divided by share price.

    * **REIT** – a company that owns or finances income‑producing real‑estate.

    * **Beta** – volatility relative to the S&P 500.

    * **Drawdown** – decline from a peak to a trough over a period.

    * **Total return** – price change plus dividends, assuming reinvestment.

    In summary, while both ETFs provide U.S. real‑estate exposure, VN Q’s lower cost and broader composition make it a solid long‑term core, whereas RWR’s REIT‑only focus offers a more concentrated bet for investors seeking pure REIT exposure.

VNQ and RWR comparison: real estate coverage versus targeted REIT allocation.