F
alls Church officials are exploring a commercial‑property surcharge to finance transportation upgrades. If approved, non‑residential owners could face an extra charge of up to 12.5¢ per $100 of assessed value—mirroring surcharges in Arlington and Fairfax. Councilwoman Laura Downs, who opened the topic at the Nov. 14 budget‑finance committee, said she does not yet back the measure but sees value in keeping the option available. “I learned a lot today,” she noted, adding that a new revenue stream could be tapped when truly needed.

    State law permits such surcharges only when the proceeds fund transit or road projects. City Manager Wyatt Shields indicated sidewalk improvements would likely be the primary beneficiary. He warned that any proposal would require a tough dialogue with the business community. Economic Development Authority chair Ross Litkenhous voiced strong opposition, arguing the measure would unfairly shift the tax burden onto businesses that already pay more than their share. “It’s like pouring salt on a wound,” he said, noting that commercial owners would pass the cost to tenants.

    This year, the council shifted residential trash and recycling fees from the general fund to homeowners, giving commercial owners some relief. Mayor Letty Hardi urged a balanced assessment of all revenue options, suggesting a comparative list would help. “We have many needs and wants,” she said. Councilwoman Erin Flynn added that a surtax could cushion anticipated federal transportation funding cuts.

    While Alexandria and Loudoun County avoid the surcharge, other Northern Virginia jurisdictions use it. If Falls Church declines, the city could market itself as a business‑friendly locale without the extra tax.