D
onald Trump's latest proposal to transform Gaza into a luxurious resort has sparked a mix of confusion and outrage. As the US president with real estate experience, it's no surprise that his foreign policy includes a dash of development. But can he truly take ownership of Gaza? The idea is as audacious as it is unrealistic.

    Trump's vision for a "Riviera of the Middle East" has been met with skepticism from Palestinians and Arab nations alike. It's a plan that disregards their deeply held wishes and would require significant American investment, not to mention a substantial military presence. Even some of Trump's Republican allies have expressed reservations about occupying Gaza.

    The proposal raises questions about Trump's commitment to the two-state solution and his willingness to engage in meaningful diplomacy with the Palestinian people. His comments on Air Force One, where he spoke of "cleaning out" Gaza and resettling Palestinians, were a stark departure from his campaign promises. During his meetings with North Korea's Kim Jong Un, Trump marveled at the country's beaches, envisioning luxury hotels and resorts.

    Trump's Gaza plan is not an isolated incident; it's part of a broader trend of American expansionism under his presidency. His interest in acquiring Greenland, making Canada the "51st state," and retaking the Panama Canal has sparked controversy and raised eyebrows. The question remains: can Trump deliver on his promises or will he abandon them like so many of his previous initiatives?

    The risks associated with Trump's Gaza proposal are significant. It could destabilize the fragile Israeli-Hamas ceasefire, alienate Arab nations, and embolden Israeli hard-liners to expand settlements. Ultimately, Trump's focus is as mercurial as ever, and it's unclear whether he'll follow through on his vision or shift gears at a moment's notice. One thing is certain: his presidency will continue to be marked by controversy and unpredictability.